If you want to create a single controller with multiple agents for each action.
How can I create it without causing conflicts as much as possible?
git
does not automatically merge conflicts unless multiple people modify the same line, which is quite
It will merge well.
In rare cases, strange merging can occur, so make sure that the UNIT test can detect it.
The rest is
I think it is also important.
When the first version of code is being added more and more, there is not much conflict and automatic merge solves it quite automatically
I have a lot to do, but
Refactoring modifies functionality and adds functionality when development begins from mid to late.
Conflicts at this time will be more difficult to resolve.
Easy-to-understand commit message
and Don't stuff a single commit
That's it.
As is often the case,
When I was fixing the bug, I found another bug, so I fixed it together.
I found a typo in the comment while fixing the bug, so I fixed other places as well
It's easy to do things like that, but I'll be patient and commit correction and typo
I think we should separate them.
when something goes wrong, such as the example in the Binary Search
section in
Identify a commit with a problem
You can read it and try it when you need it.
For git,
in development workflows such as git flow
and pull requests
There is also a strategy to develop in line with
Merge independent functional units between branches or
As for merging bug fix requests with pull requests,
When multiple developers develop similar code at the same time, I feel like it's not peeling.
Each developer frequently commits, pulls, and pushes the source code
in the same branch.
I think it's better to develop it with a small difference.
If the team grows up and there is another team that is creating a completely different function, the team will be developed in a separate branch
I think it's better to merge branches regularly.
Detailed operations may vary depending on the team, but for your information...
© 2024 OneMinuteCode. All rights reserved.