[javascript] When executing a callback function with a factor in a temporary variable

Asked 2 years ago, Updated 2 years ago, 115 views

Hi, everyone. When you call addEventListener with a callback function in a temporary variable, something suddenly popped up. Originally, when a scroll event occurs, I wrote the code first to check whether the event was passed through the callback function well.

    var printEvent = function(e){
      console.log(e); 
    }
    window.addEventListener('scroll',printEvent));

Come to think of it, a function called printEvent had to have e defined when it was originally executed, and it had to have a factor in printEvent when it was executed.

    var printEvent = function(e){
      console.log(e); 
    }
    printEvent(10);

Intuitively, if the callback function does not have a factor, I think it will naturally be implemented by just adding the name of the temporary variable. If you receive e as a factor of the callback function like this, shouldn't you pass the factor like window.addEventListener('scroll',printEvent(e));?

So I wrote it like that, and then I ran the code.

    var printEvent = function(e){
      console.log(e); 
    }
    window.addEventListener('scroll',printEvent(e));

It says e is not defined. This error occurs because it is not defined in the conste = 10; manner.

Question 1) Does the callback function that receives the factor as a temporary variable treat the callback function as if the factor was passed together just by entering the temporary variable when executing it?

Question 2) The addEventListener function receives e as a factor anyway. You return the event internally, or the event is declared, right?

Thank you for reading the question!!

javascript callback

2022-09-22 18:01

1 Answers

Answer 1. No.

Answer 2. You should approach the concept of registering the action to be executed at the event from the outside. When an event occurs internally, a registered callback is executed, but an event object (with a predefined specification) is created and added as a factor for the function.

It is important to know who puts the event object in the callback.

Let me give you an example.

// A simple emulation of window.addEventHandler.
var obj = {
  typeDescription: ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'],

  addListener: function (type, handler) {
    // The type is in the specification
    // If handler is a viable function,
    if (this.typeDescription.indexOf(type) >= 0 && typeof handler === 'function') {
      window.setTimeout(function() {
        var event = { type: type, timeStamp: Date.now() };
        handler(event); // [run] the handler received by the listener at a particular time.
      }, 100);
    }
  }
};

var printEventObject = function (e) {
  console.log(e);
}; // Function expression.

obj.addListener('foo', printEventObject); // Do not [run] here.

So let's take a look at the case you mentioned.

obj.addListener('foo', printEventObject(e)); 

In this case, the second factor,

printEventObject(e)

This function is evaluated first. The value e is not declared within the accessible scope, so it spits reference errors.

Compared to normal operating codes that do not use temporary variables,

obj.addListener('foo', function(e) { // eventually the same function expression.
  console.log(e);
}); 

If you look at the second factor, you just create a function, but you don't do it.

Callback is to hand over a viable form, not to put in a form where the function is executed.

Apart from the questioning situation,

The following function execution (closure) is not passed by receiving the e value from the outside.

var printTimeStamp = function (prefix) {
  Return function(e) { // Meaning of "I'll get the event object and use it well"
    console.log(prefix + e.timeStamp);
  };
};
obj.addListener('foo', printTimeStamp('Time: ')); 

But it works fine. This is because the function that printTimeStamp returns is designed to accept the factor well.

At the time of registering an event as a temporary variable, the event value e is not visible, so I think I need to do something to hand it over to the function registered in the variable, but I don't need to. You only need to hand over the handler that you hand over to fit the required form you require.


2022-09-22 18:01

If you have any answers or tips


© 2024 OneMinuteCode. All rights reserved.