If you create a constructor with parameters in C#, C++, and Java, the default constructor without parameters disappears. Before, I thought it was just like that, but I suddenly became curious about why?
What's the reason for this? Is this just a safety precaution, "I've already created a generator, so I probably don't need any default generator like this?" Or is there a technical reason why adding one constructor prevents the compiler from making it?
c++ java c# default-constructor
There is no technical reason why the compiler cannot add a constructor just because the user defines it. However, if you want to instantiate a class in a non-static class that does not define a constructor, the compiler does nothing, but you must add a default constructor that can be instantiated. So it doesn't have to include an empty constructor to make my code work.
If you define a constructor with one or more parameters, you can use this constructor to initialize the contents of the class when you instantiate the class, and if the compiler defines a default constructor at random, it increases the likelihood that someone will skip this logic and create a bug. If you need a default constructor, it is preferable to explicitly define a default constructor.
600 GDB gets version error when attempting to debug with the Presense SDK (IDE)
888 When building Fast API+Uvicorn environment with PyInstaller, console=False results in an error
567 rails db:create error: Could not find mysql2-0.5.4 in any of the sources
568 Who developed the "avformat-59.dll" that comes with FFmpeg?
© 2024 OneMinuteCode. All rights reserved.