Regarding the quota application for Youtube data API

Asked 1 years ago, Updated 1 years ago, 269 views

Regarding the Youtube data API quota application,
As a trial, I created the same program as the existing service and applied for it.
For some reason, it was not allowed as a policy violation.

Policy I.16 (Additional Prohibitions)

The screen configuration and functionality are exactly the same, so
In that sense, there should be no violation, but
The reason is explained only as a violation of the above policy.
I don't know what the violation is

https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms/developer-policies#i.-additional-prohibitions

I read the contents of the policy, but I don't think there's any special problem. In the first place, other companies' services can use the app normally, so
I think it can't be considered a violation.

Is there anything more specific about this?

By the way, the service in Japan is called kamuitracer.
I don't want to do the same thing, but
When I applied for the API, it was dropped, so I would like to know the cause.

In addition, in order to comply with the policy as well as possible,
Is there any support that I can get specific advice?
The comments at the time of application were not specific and did not explain what caused them. In addition, it was done elsewhere, but it was mysteriously judged that it was not allowed to apply, so
I would like your support to tell me more about it

youtube

2022-09-30 22:03

1 Answers

I usually don't give you a specific reason for this, so I have to ask someone I know, but it seems that there is a smartphone app application agency, but the API quota increase rejection reason survey and application agency are too niche for me.

  • Looking for companies with experience in developing Web services using Youtube
  • Ask experienced crowdsourcing or something

Is that so?

By the way, what bothered me was the fact that I cloned another company's service and applied for it as a dummy, and the fact that it was declared as a matter of course.The application itself may be judged to be malicious, and the claim that "I am legitimate and the examination is wrong" from a third party is honestly hard to accept.In that respect, wouldn't it be better to do it with someone else (rather than just asking for a specific matter)?


2022-09-30 22:03

If you have any answers or tips


© 2024 OneMinuteCode. All rights reserved.