Regarding application application when using LUKeychainAccess

Is using the keychain to keep the application download history OK with your application application?

Strictly speaking, it is not the original keychain usage, but it is generally accepted as a storage area that remains even if such applications are deleted, and I have never heard of it being rejected in the review, so it is usually fine.

If I specify a link to the MIT license description page, will there be no problem with the application application?

Would it be a problem to apply for the application if the configuration application provided a link to the MIT license description page instead of inside the application?

OSS licensing is a problem with the software author, so neither has anything to do with applying for the application.Applications can be released without the need for a separate license.

In general, both methods of displaying OSS licenses within an application or in a configuration application are widely used.It's better to display whatever you want.

For example, Apple's Keynote and Numbers display the OSS license as a "thank you" in the configuration application.Instagram and Twitter are displayed in the app.I think it's better to look up some apps and follow the way you like them.