When it comes to large-scale data collection, you often need to stream and
Topics such as Amazon Kinesis and Apache Stream will appear.
Multiple Servers - > Amazon Kinesis - > Amazon Redshift
and so on.
Multiple Servers - > Amazon Redshift
Is it a transaction problem to save directly to DB from multiple servers?I understand that streaming processing is done because processing is not keeping up with it.
However, if you put a streaming server in between, you'll end up running the data from left to right, and eventually you won't be able to keep up with the processing.
Actually, that's not the case, and I think the streaming server is doing well, but I'm looking into it to learn about it, but I couldn't find any good materials.
*One thing that comes to mind is that the streaming server stores the data to some extent and puts the data into the DB when it is stored more than a certain amount.
I would appreciate it if you could let me know based on your experience.
Thank you for your cooperation.
aws
If a large number of data sources are accessing the datastore directly,
There are many problems such as and so on.If there is something between the data source and the datastore that buffers, these problems can be easily resolved.
Performance is key, but not all.
Learn what Amazon Kinesis is from examples
The article in the link above summarizes the advantages of Amazon Kinesis in a compact way, so it would be good if you could refer to it.
This article is a little over a year ago, so the information may be a little out of date.
What comes to mind about the reason why I'm
If asynchronous processing does not equal the throughput of input data and the processing power of the output destination, I think it is common to temporarily save it somewhere (queueing, caching, etc.)
To ensure data order and allow batch processing of large amounts of input data in parallel, I think it is temporarily stored.
The ability to retrieve the same data over and over again may also be difficult with a proxy-like data transfer mechanism.
Considering that the resources are finite, I think that sometimes output processing cannot keep up.There is also a limitation to keeping data put to Kinesis up to 24 hours, so if you have never taken it out before and the output side has not processed it, you will miss it.
Also, there is no limit to Kinesis throughput, but it scales only to 10 shards by default.If the throughput is insufficient, the application should mitigate it.
Please refer to FAQ
https://aws.amazon.com/jp/kinesis/streams/faqs/
If it is the role of streaming processing, I think it is to process a large amount of input data in real time and output it to a data warehouse.The Apache Spark Stream site's materials were easy to understand as an overview.
http://spark.apache.org/talks/
http://spark.apache.org/talks/strata_spark_streaming.pdf
According to this document, there are five requirements for the Streaming Framework:
The role of streaming processing is to do this.
546 Understanding How to Configure Google API Key
542 Unable to install versioned in Google Colab
537 Uncaught (inpromise) Error on Electron: An object could not be cloned
549 PHP ssh2_scp_send fails to send files as intended
548 rails db:create error: Could not find mysql2-0.5.4 in any of the sources
© 2024 OneMinuteCode. All rights reserved.