Which option would you prefer to deploy pip to Ubuntu? apt or get-pip.py

I am troubled because I cannot understand the difference in how to introduce pip with Ubuntu 20.04+Python3.

When deploying pip on Ubuntu, which is better, using apt or get-pip.py?

Eventually, I wanted to use Rundeck's WinRM Node Executor and tried to deploy pywinrm.

installation commands:

• sudo apt install python3-pip
• Install to: /usr/bin/pip3

Package to:

• apt:
  • /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/
• sudo pip3 install:
  • /usr/local/lib/python 3.8/dist-packages
• pip3 install:
  • /home/username/.local/lib/python 3.8/site-packages

• /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/

• /usr/local/lib/python 3.8/dist-packages

• /home/username/.local/lib/python 3.8/site-packages

With the above configuration, if you use the python CLI on the console, you can use either method of packaging.

However, only pywinrm (python3-winrm) with apt was available from Rundeck's WinRM Node Executor.

I don't understand why the package under /usr/local/lib/is not available, let alone the third one under .local.

When using pip in Ubuntu, is it better to use the following get-pip.py instead of using apt?If Ubuntu officially manages it, I thought I should try it from there, but I couldn't find any satisfactory information.

I would appreciate it if you could give me your advice.

installation commands:

• curl https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py-o get-pip.py
• python3 get-pip.py

Note: https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/installing/